Search
 
Best Practices

Falling Out Of Favor

Even though they weren't banned, synthetic leases appear to be losing their appeal

By staff Writer | Updated on February 01, 2003

In 1993, Cisco Systems Inc. reported net income of $172 million on revenues of $649 million. At the time, it employed about 1,000 workers, but foresaw its headcount ballooning as the company embarked on a string of acquisitions that would create the telecom behemoth it is today. To accommodate that growth, Cisco began an office-space expansion that year and financed it with synthetic leases in order to preserve cash and leverage for its upcoming M&A. Destined to become all the rage in the 1990s, synthetic leases are off-balance sheet financial tools that unload debt to special-purpose entities, or SPEs. Their purpose: to allow high-growth, but cash poor or below investment grade concerns to get the use of sizable amounts of relatively inexpensive capital without hurting their debt to equity ratios.

The 1990s are over, and to a large extent, so too are synthetic leases. Thanks to Enron Corp., which buried a multitude of debt in its various SPEs, synthetic leases are now red flags to investors and regulators that corporate hanky-panky could be afoot. In 2002 Cisco paid $1.9 billion to extract itself from these clever arrangements, opting instead to put the real estate on its books. This was no big deal for Cisco, which in its fiscal 2002 fourth quarter boasted revenues of more than $4.8 billion and a net profit of $772 million in what was undeniably a bad year for the San Jose, Calif.-based company. Cisco no longer needed the synthetic leases from a liquidity perspective and felt their very existence–despite the fact that it dutifully disclosed them–was a negative for shareholders. “Cisco has grown so huge that the impact of the real estate has been minimized,” observes Craig Lund, president of San Jose-based Lund Financial Corp., which put together more than 70 synthetic lease deals over the past decade.

Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to Treasury & Risk, part of your ALM digital membership.

Your access to unlimited Treasury & Risk content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Critical Treasury & Risk information including in-depth analysis of treasury and finance best practices, case studies with corporate innovators, informative newsletters, educational webcasts and videos, and resources from industry leaders.
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM and Treasury & Risk events.
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including PropertyCasualty360.com and Law.com.

Already have an account?

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Recommended Stories

Why Companies Are Racing to the U.S. Debt Market

Why Companies Are Racing to the U.S. Debt Market

Caleb Mutua & Jeannine Amodeo |

Borrowing costs have become compelling, as markets are already pricing in expectations for reduced interest rates. And several external factors could reverse that trend.

Treasury & Risk

Join Treasury & Risk

Don’t miss crucial treasury and finance news along with in-depth analysis and insights you need to make informed treasury decisions. Join Treasury & Risk now!

  • Free unlimited access to Treasury & Risk including case studies with corporate innovators, informative newsletters, educational webcasts, and resources from industry leaders.
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM and Treasury & Risk events.
  • Access to other award-winning ALM publications including PropertyCasualty360.com and Law.com.

Already have an account? Sign In Now
Join Treasury & Risk

Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.