First was the dramatic rise in the monetary value of the top workplace class-action settlements.

Second, federal and state courts put out numerous favorable class action certification rulings for the plaintiffs, but “evolving case law precedents and new defense approaches resulted in better outcomes for employers in opposing class certification requests,” according to the report.

Third, filings and settlements of government enforcement litigation didn't do an about-face from the Obama-era pro-worker stance last year. Instead, government enforcement litigation actually increased in 2017.

However, in 2018, it looks as if that trend is likely to change under the Trump administration's appointees and direction, but that doesn't necessarily mean that a lack of government litigation on the behalf of workers will mean a reduction in worker challenges. Instead, “the ultimate effect … may well prompt the private plaintiffs' class action bar to 'fill the void' and expand the volume of workplace litigation pursued against employers over the coming year as the DOL and the EEOC adjust their litigation enforcement activities,” the report says.

Fourth, more pro-business decisions by the Supreme Court, coupled with the appointment of Neil Gorsuch and key decisions to be delivered in 2018, look likely to “change the class action playing field in profound ways…. [L]itigation dynamics may well be reshaped in ways that further change the playbook for prosecuting and defending class actions.”

The report also expects more decertification wins for employers, who won 63 percent of wage and hour decertification rulings last year that was up nearly 20 percent from 2016.

BenefitsPro