His comments, along with those from Donald Trump's trade czar Tuesday, suggest the U.S. will begin to finalize its pact with Mexico, while somehow continuing talks with Canada—and holding open the possibility of tucking the northern nation into the deal at a later date. The U.S. has said it will sign a deal with Mexico by the end of November, with or without Canada.

The U.S. and Canada remain in “near-continuous negotiations,” Trudeau said, adding that his foreign minister—who is leading the NAFTA file—will address the UN on Saturday, signaling there won't be a last-minute bargaining push in Washington that day. “We will keep working as long as it takes to get to the right deal for Canada,” he said.

|

Trump Handshake

Trudeau also downplayed a brief handshake with Trump at a luncheon Tuesday, where the U.S. president remained seated despite standing to greet other leaders. The prime minister said it was a quick and cordial encounter and that people shouldn't read too much into it.

MacNaughton, speaking Wednesday in Toronto, said Canada wants to reach a deal that Trump can hail as a victory but nevertheless has red-line issues, including the need for dispute panels and protection from tariffs.

“I don't like playing chicken with the future of the Canadian economy,” the ambassador said at an event hosted by Politico. “On the other hand, there are things where basically we are just not prepared to give into because it would really render the agreement meaningless.”

On dispute resolution, the Trudeau government wants to keep some form of NAFTA's Chapter 19 panels, and the U.S. wants to eliminate them. On tariffs, Canada wants protection from so-called Section 232 national security measures the Trump administration has imposed on steel and aluminum imports from Canada and other countries. The U.S. is also threatening similar tariffs on auto imports.

“If you can't resolve disputes in a fair and balanced way, then what's the use of the agreement?” MacNaughton said. “If you can't have some curb on the arbitrary use of tariffs under the guise of national security with a member of NORAD and somebody who is your closest defense partner, then I don't think it's much of agreement.”

Auto tariffs in particular “would change the whole relationship for a long time to come,” he added. He said he didn't know when, or if, those might be imposed by the president.

Trudeau called the tariffs “unjust” and noted that Trump has previously said publicly that a NAFTA deal would mean there'd be no need for 232 tariffs. Canada needs a NAFTA deal “that involves obviously feeling confident about the path forward,” the prime minister said.

A day earlier, Lighthizer also cited Chapter 19 as a sticking point, while saying the subject of 232 tariffs would probably be dealt with later, rather than as part of an overall NAFTA deal as initially sought. He also said dairy is a sticking point.

Canada is looking for a way to reach a deal that Trump can hail as a triumph, MacNaughton said. “Our desire is to try and find a way in which we can get this agreement done where he can, in his own way, declare victory—to have some kind of a win for what he said he wanted to achieve.”

Any final deal on NAFTA will include language around gender and indigenous rights, as initially sought by Canada, he said. Neither Lighthizer nor other U.S. negotiators ever cited that as a major sticking point in talks, he said.

From: Bloomberg

Copyright 2018 Bloomberg. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.