“They made it clear that they didn't want to designate anyone,” said Marcus Stanley, policy director at Americans for Financial Reform in Washington.

Despite FSOC's reluctance, Wall Street retains plenty of systemic-risk labels. That's because Dodd-Frank automatically slapped JPMorgan Chase & Co., Citigroup Inc., Goldman Sachs Group Inc., and other huge lenders with aggressive Fed supervision and stiff capital rules.

Yet the hesitancy to subject non-banks to added scrutiny comes at a potentially fraught time. Former Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen is among those who have raised concerns that some of the riskiest financing of highly indebted companies is being done outside the traditional banking sector. And private-equity firms have seized an increasing share of the lending market.

FSOC members include the heads of the Treasury Department, the Fed, and the Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC). Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, who leads the panel, said in a Wednesday statement that the Prudential decision shows “the council has continued to act decisively to remove any designation that is not warranted.” He added that regulators conducted a detailed analysis verifying that the insurer didn't pose a “significant risk” to financial stability.

Prudential added that it shouldn't have been labeled a threat in the first place, issuing a statement that said it “never met the standard for designation.”

Other companies have made similar arguments, claiming the process was opaque, inconsistent, and even political.

American International Group Inc. (AIG), which played a central role in the 2008 crisis, got labeled even though it had shrunk after the meltdown. Additional insurers including Prudential and MetLife Inc. that were bigger than AIG also received the tag. But Warren Buffett's Berkshire and Blackrock, the world's largest money manager, didn't.

Last year, Treasury proposed a roadmap for overhauling FSOC designations that would make it harder to affix the risk tags.

The plan urged the council to focus on how an entire industry might pose risks, rather than prioritizing the dangers presented by specific firms. Labeling companies as systemically important should be done only if the council is certain a firm is likely to get into trouble. The result: More hurdles for a process that had mostly ground to a halt even during the Obama administration.

Craig Phillips, a top Treasury official, said recently that regulators are working on a way to declare specific business activities—not companies—as risks.

Such an approach is designed to fail because FSOC has no direct method for regulating activities that set off alarms, says Stanley. He calls it “an excuse for doing nothing.”

At the height of its muscle-flexing in the years immediately after the 2008 crisis, FSOC placed Prudential and three other financial titans under heightened Fed oversight: AIG, MetLife, and General Electric Co.'s finance arm. Asset managers Blackrock and Pacific Investment Management Co. avoided the risk label after aggressively lobbying agency heads appointed by former President Barack Obama.

Starting in 2016, companies began slipping out of FSOC's grasp, with GE Capital exiting after selling financial assets and MetLife winning a court battle over its designation. Last year, regulators selected by Trump helped let out AIG.

From: Bloomberg

Copyright 2018 Bloomberg. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.