Few dispute that Chinese tech giants have shaken up retail banking, changing how millions of customers do everything from paying their bills to choosing insurance. But the real disruption may be occurring in a more staid corner of finance—and it's being led by Wall Street.
As investment-banking revenues slumped in the wake of the global financial crisis, traditional broker-dealers found that trading and deal-making weren't cutting it. Steadier money could be made in cash management, the humdrum business of assisting multinational companies with daily liquidity and getting the most out of idle deposits by deploying them in global markets.
JPMorgan Chase & Co.'s treasury services business, its lingo for cash management, hit a 20 percent return on equity last year, compared with 15 percent for its corporate and investment bank. Citigroup Inc., a global leader in this area, posted a return on equity from transaction banking (which is dominated by cash management) in the mid-20 percent range, according to a 2017 investor presentation.
These sort of results underpin Goldman Sachs Group Inc.'s recent decision to use technology to make a splash in cash-management—in Japan, among other countries—as part of a global push later this year. The country's appeal is two-fold. Corporate treasuries everywhere seek yen assets when they want to hide from global turmoil. Meanwhile, Japan could also support Goldman's fledgling ambitions in online retail banking, which requires reliable access to liquidity. Taking a digital platform to cash-rich, yield-hungry Japanese companies—and snagging even a sliver of their deposits—would mean cheaper funding than the wholesale market.
It should also help Goldman that Japan's megabanks don't even crack the top 15 among Asia-Pacific cash-management leaders, according to Gaurav Arora, head of Asia Pacific at Greenwich Associates. While Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc., Mizuho Financial Group Inc., and Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group Inc. are upgrading their technology and expanding their digital reach, they remain well behind global players. Out of Mizuho's surprise 680 billion yen ($6.2 billion) writedown in March, about 460 billion yen was related to a long-delayed move to integrate its computer systems. For their part, the megabanks must be worried about Goldman's arrival. The likes of Citigroup Inc. and HSBC Holdings Plc were already beginning to challenge Japanese banks' longstanding domestic client relationships by winning over their overseas units.
While the initial costs involved in building out a platform are high—think of all the banking licenses and regulatory approvals required in a vast region like Asia—cash management is sticky. Once a finance department adopts and integrates a bank's system, it doesn't flip for a competitor easily. This is also a low-margin business, albeit with high operating leverage; it doesn't require capital set aside to manage the risk of credit losses. And unlike investment banking, growth doesn't depend on million-dollar bankers.
Japan could become a testing ground to move this business fully online. Goldman inevitably will need brick-and-mortar partners to manage the physical cash collected by domestic distributors for multinational clients such as Procter & Gamble Co. In that vein, the bank's entry could be a model for other Wall Street firms that lack a physical footprint. But global banks already big in cash management have a major advantage: They can simply protect their turf by beefing up digital offerings.
The idea that banks' software should seamlessly connect with clients' online applications is gathering interest. Three-quarters of large companies in Asia Pacific said they sought so-called open banking arrangements, with treasury management among their top three priorities, according to an Accenture Plc survey last year. Half of the bankers in the region expect 5 percent to 10 percent of their divisions' revenue growth in the next three to five years to come from open banking for commercial customers. Another 43 percent gave even more optimistic forecasts to the the consulting firm.
Managing corporate cash online isn't as sexy as a consumer super app. But it's not yet clear that retail customers can transition from keeping small sums on deposit for movie tickets and pizza delivery to forking over substantial shares of their income and wealth to web-only banks, as we wrote previously. Without steady retail deposits, the fintech dream of lending to small businesses will remain just that.
Eking out a digital win for a bank like Goldman, which can lean on its investment-banking relationships to sign up cash-rich multinationals, is perhaps a more modest leap of faith—and the landing may be more sure-footed.
Copyright 2019 Bloomberg. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to Treasury & Risk, part of your ALM digital membership.
Your access to unlimited Treasury & Risk content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Thought leadership on regulatory changes, economic trends, corporate success stories, and tactical solutions for treasurers, CFOs, risk managers, controllers, and other finance professionals
- Informative weekly newsletter featuring news, analysis, real-world case studies, and other critical content
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical coverage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
*May exclude premium content© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.