Employers are making strides to pay workers of all ethnicities and genders equitably, according to WorldatWork's Pay Equity Practices and Priorities Survey.
The nonprofit polled more than 350 of its members—compensation managers at large employers—and found that a significant majority (79 percent) are now conducting gender pay gap analyses as a standard practice. Nearly the same percentage (71 percent) are making broad pay-equity analyses standard practice.
Over half (55 percent) are executing remediation strategies, and 52 percent are evaluating their remediation options. Just 9 percent of the respondents say they are not considering doing gender pay gap analysis.
Pay equity is becoming increasingly top-of-mind for HR professionals, says WorldatWork president and CEO Scott Cawood: "It's not just about salary, though. Organizations are expanding their understanding of areas where potential biases or gaps may exist, and they are working to address issues linked to the concerns around any personal attribute being used in any process that ultimately impacts salary, including hiring, promotion, and feedback systems."
Indeed, the vast majority of respondents are now addressing, or plan to address, pay equity within their recruitment practices (88 percent); individual pay determination decisions (83 percent); hiring practices (83 percent); and selection practices (81 percent).
However, less attention is currently being paid to determining whether there are any pay disparities in healthcare, well-being, and retirement benefits (58 percent); paid time off and flexibility benefits (55 percent); and dependent/elder care benefits (35 percent).
"While the survey reveals positive movement towards pay-equity remediation, benefits programs are receiving the least amount of attention when looking for potential biases that may contribute to pay disparities," Cawood says.
"Understanding of how benefits programming can skew to attract or serve one group over another is beginning to emerge."
More broadly, in an effort to identify or reduce potential biases, respondents are routinely looking at market data (73 percent) and re-examining their performance management practices (69 percent).
"The finding about performance management practices is intriguing," Cawood says. "One-third (32 percent) of organizations are not looking at performance management practices in the context of pay equity, despite the often subjective nature of those programs."
However, employers need to realize that the level of scrutiny for all pay-related systems will only increase in the next few years, he says.
"In the future, performance management programs will have to adhere to updated frameworks in order to be bias-free," Cawood says.
From: BenefitsPro
Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to Treasury & Risk, part of your ALM digital membership.
Your access to unlimited Treasury & Risk content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Thought leadership on regulatory changes, economic trends, corporate success stories, and tactical solutions for treasurers, CFOs, risk managers, controllers, and other finance professionals
- Informative weekly newsletter featuring news, analysis, real-world case studies, and other critical content
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical coverage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
*May exclude premium content© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Katie Kuehner-Hebert
Katie Kuehner-Hebert is a freelance writer based in Running Springs, Calif. She has more than three decades of journalism experience, with particular expertise in employee benefits and other human resource topics.
