In the recent Supreme Court decision on Hughes v. Northwestern University, retirement plan participants alleged that plan fiduciaries breached their duties. The fact that the case went as high as the Supreme Court meant it attracted much attention from the retirement industry.
To get a clearer picture on the implications of the Supreme Court's ruling, Treasury & Risk sister publication BenefitsPRO turned to attorney Emily Seymour Costin, a partner with Alston & Bird LLP, for help. Alston & Bird associate Ellie Studdard also contributed to the responses.
Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to Treasury & Risk, part of your ALM digital membership.
Your access to unlimited Treasury & Risk content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Thought leadership on regulatory changes, economic trends, corporate success stories, and tactical solutions for treasurers, CFOs, risk managers, controllers, and other finance professionals
- Informative weekly newsletter featuring news, analysis, real-world case studies, and other critical content
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical coverage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
*May exclude premium content© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
