Let's say an employer decides to give workers the option of working either on site or remotely. Over the next year, the employer notices that certain workers are choosing to go into the office more often than others. The employer begins to reach the conclusion that the first group of workers is more invested in their work and fits better within the company culture. When it comes time to dole out promotions or other opportunities, workers in the first group come first to the employer's mind.
As many companies across the country move permanently towards hybrid work arrangements, the possibility of this scenario has become a growing concern for professionals in many fields. They fear the two groups will be split along gendered lines, as many women continue to shoulder the brunt of caregiving duties and consequently need to work remotely more often than their male colleagues.
Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to Treasury & Risk, part of your ALM digital membership.
Your access to unlimited Treasury & Risk content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Thought leadership on regulatory changes, economic trends, corporate success stories, and tactical solutions for treasurers, CFOs, risk managers, controllers, and other finance professionals
- Informative weekly newsletter featuring news, analysis, real-world case studies, and other critical content
- Educational webcasts, white papers, and ebooks from industry thought leaders
- Critical coverage of the employee benefits and financial advisory markets on our other ALM sites, PropertyCasualty360 and ThinkAdvisor
Already have an account? Sign In Now
*May exclude premium content© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.