Bristol-Myers Squibb

As the retirement industry evolves from guaranteed lifetime pension plans to 401(k)s, pension risk transfers (PRTs) have become the linchpin connecting the past, present, and future of retirement benefits. Pension risk transfers enable firms to offload the burdensome administration of allocating pension plan.

Bristol-Myers Squibb is one firm that offloaded its $2.6 billion pension plan in 2019 and has been hit with a “frivolous lawsuit,” according to the ERISA Industry Committee, which is now petitioning the court to dismiss the lawsuit.

Recommended For You

As private equity firms have ramped up their pursuit of pension risk transfer deals, the number of related lawsuits has surged. The suits allege that companies are bypassing their Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) fiduciary responsibilities to select the safest annuity for their employees’ pension plans.

Bristol Myers Squibb completed the transfer to Athene Annuity & Life Assurance in a full termination of its pension plan. Then, last year, the pharmaceutical company and its independent fiduciary State Street Global Advisors Trust were hit with a class-action lawsuit filed by former employee Charles Doherty on behalf of 24,000 plan members. Although ERISA permits the practice of transferring pension plan assets to an annuity arrangement, the plaintiffs allege that this pension risk transfer transaction breached ERISA’s fiduciary duties because the insurance company chosen for the transaction was not the “safest” annuity provider. The suit alleges that Bristol Myers Squibb stood to gain by paying less than it would have paid for a “safer” annuity.

Now industry groups are urging the court to dismiss the lawsuit, according to the ERISA Industry Committee. ERIC, along with coalition allies American Benefits Council and Committee on Investment of Employee Benefit Assets, filed an amicus brief in the U.S. District Court of the Southern District of New York to dismiss Doherty v. Bristol Myers Squibb. 

In its brief, ERIC, which represents 100 of the nation’s largest employers, asserts that “ERISA expressly permits pension risk transfers, and the alleged ‘harms’ [that] plaintiffs plead are natural consequences of every pension risk transfer, regardless of which insurer is involved. … Ultimately, plaintiffs have experienced no harm from the transaction they challenge.”

Since 2023, Lockheed Martin, AT&T, Verizon, Alcoa, GE, Weyerhaeuser Company, and Lumen Technologies have been sued by employees in class-action pension risk transfer lawsuits. “These PRT lawsuits are based on the unquestioned fiduciary duty of the employer that already exists under ERISA,” said Jerry Schlichter, founder of Schlichter Bogard, who is a pioneer in legal action against 401(k) and 403(b) plan sponsors on behalf of retirees and savers. “They all have Athene taking over their former pension obligations, and Athene is owned by a private equity firm with an in-house reinsurer based offshore, rather than a traditional life insurance company that is not owned by an offshore private equity firm.”

“These complaints are entirely baseless attempts by class-action attorneys to enrich themselves at the expense of retirees,” according to a spokesperson for Athene. “Every pension group annuity participant whose benefits have been guaranteed by Athene has received and will receive their promised benefits in full. In each pension group annuity transaction for which Athene has been selected, there has been a robust review process carried out by a fiduciary and their independent advisers who are experts at assessing insurer safety. Athene operates from a position of outstanding financial strength, and is a safe and secure provider of annuity benefits. We are properly reserved, and have excellent capitalization and strong credit ratings, with a recent rating upgrade to A+ by AM Best.”

“Like the 401(k) fee class-actions that came before them, this new wave of pension risk transfer litigation appears to be the next proverbial pot of gold for the plaintiffs’ bar,” said Tom Christina, executive director of the ERIC Legal Center. “If meritless claims like this advance beyond swift dismissal, there is significant risk the floodgates will burst open, and plaintiffs’ firms will get a big payday while employers and employees will be faced with big legal bills and an even bigger threat to the retirement system we know today. This would be devastating to plan sponsors and, in turn, to the participants who rely on them for jobs and benefits.”

————————————————————
From: BenefitsPRO

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Lynn Cavanaugh

Lynn Varacalli Cavanaugh is Senior Editor, Retirement at BenefitsPRO. Prior, she was editor-in-chief of the What's New in Benefits & Compensation newsletter. She has worked for major firms in the employee benefits space, Vanguard and Willis Towers Watson, as well as top media companies, including Condé Nast and American Media.